Science nugget: Resolving proton and alpha beams for improved understanding of plasma kinetics: SWA-PAS observations - Solar Orbiter
Resolving proton and alpha beams for improved understanding of plasma kinetics: SWA-PAS observations
(Solar Orbiter Nugget #40 by Roberto Bruno1, Rossana De Marco1, Raffaella D’Amicis1, Denise Perrone2, Maria Federica Marcucci1, Daniele Telloni3, Raffaele Marino4, Luca Sorriso-Valvo5,12, Vito Fortunato6, Gennaro Mele7, Francesco Monti8, Andrei Fedorov9, Philippe Louarn9, Chris J. Owen10, and Stefano Livi11)
Introduction
A crucial step in unraveling the mechanisms behind wave-particle interactions, which drive the heating and acceleration of solar wind particles, lies in the detailed analysis of the non-Maxwellian characteristics of the particle velocity distribution function (VDF). Features such as temperature anisotropies and particle beams offer critical insights into these processes. In particular, the ability to separate the beam from the core within the VDF, especially for the two dominant solar wind components, is essential. This separation enhances our understanding of how energy is transferred and provides a clearer picture of the underlying physics that governs solar wind dynamics and thermodynamics. For example, by separating the two populations for the protons, we can distinguish between the behaviors of the bulk solar wind plasma (core) and the faster, more energetic population (beam) that might arise from different physical processes. The beam is a secondary proton population, often moving faster than the core. It is typically more anisotropic and is believed to originate from processes such as wave-particle interactions, proton-proton collisions, or magnetic reconnection in the solar corona.
The presence of a proton beam can drive various plasma instabilities that impact the evolution of the solar wind. These instabilities, such as the Alfvén-cyclotron instability and the mirror-mode instability, can generate waves and turbulence, affecting the heating, acceleration, and scattering of particles. If the core and beam are not separated, we might overlook these instabilities and their impact on the plasma's behavior.
A similar conclusion applies to alpha particles, though specific studies that separately analyze the core and beam kinetics of alpha particles are currently lacking. To the best of our knowledge, our recently published study [1] is the first to provide a full 3D kinetic characterization of both populations in phase space, representing a significant advancement in solar wind kinetic research.
Separating different ion populations
We used an innovative numerical approach, applying a machine learning clustering technique to distinguish between the different populations within the VDF, surpassing the limitations of the traditional bi-Maxwellian fitting method [2]. This approach simplifies the identification of distinct particle populations and allows for the generation of robust statistics on the kinetic properties of both core and beam populations for protons and alpha particles. In Figure 1a, we present, for the first time in the literature, the RTN velocity space for the proton core (red), proton beam (black), alpha core (blue), and alpha beam (green) populations, as identified by our code [2]. We calculated moments for approximately 60,000 particle VDFs at 4-s cadence within a high-velocity stream observed at 0.58 AU by the Proton and Alpha Sensor (PAS) onboard Solar Orbiter. PAS is one of the three sensors in the Solar Wind Analyser (SWA) plasma suite [3]. As expected, the four populations are aligned with the average magnetic field vector. Proton core, alpha core, alpha beam, and proton beam velocity fluctuations are all distributed over the surfaces of a sort of hemispheres characterized by different radii [4]. Interestingly enough, the concavity of these hemispheres for proton and alpha beams is opposite to that of the proton core and, less clearly, to that of the alpha core. This distinct feature in velocity space is closely associated with Alfvénic fluctuations. In the following sections, we will focus specifically on the Alfvénic characteristics of the velocity fluctuations observed in the core and beam populations of protons and alpha particles. For a more detailed analysis of the kinetic properties of both the core and beam, we refer the reader to our recently published work [1].
Figure 1a: RTN velocity space for the proton core (red), proton beam (black), alpha core (blue), and alpha beam (green), with projections onto orthogonal planes (gray dots). The cyan arrow marks the average magnetic field direction, while the star shows the center of mass velocity (fluid speed) projection. Colored dots represent the average speed of each population. The time interval covers 12 hours, with a PAS sampling time of 4 seconds. Figure 1b: Schematic of phase space in the RTN system showing velocity fluctuations of the proton core (p1, red), alpha core (α1, blue), proton beam (p2, black), and alpha beam (α2, green) due to Alfvén waves. The black star represents the fluid velocity from all populations. The cyan arrow marks the average magnetic field direction and the WF, marked by the intersection of dashed lines, is located 1 Alfvén speed from the bulk velocity Vbulk . The various Δ VWF represent the velocity drift of each population from WF.
Estimating the correct Alfvén velocity fluctuation for each population
The mechanism at the basis of these fluctuations is sketched in Figure 1b. There is a particular frame in phase space that represents the center of the oscillations of protons and alphas [5, 6, 7]. This frame is the wave frame (WF). In this frame, no electric field is associated with the fluctuations, and each particle’s velocity will change only in direction maintaining a constant speed. Consequently, each particle will be forced to move on the surface of a constant radius in phase space, being the concavity of the resultant hemisphere due to the value of the particle’s drift velocity with respect to the WF.
The WF in Figure 1b is represented by the crossing point of the two dashed lines, which limit the amplitude of the fluctuations of each population around this pivotal point. This point is one Alfvén speed from the bulk velocity, i.e. the velocity of the center of mass, represented by the black star symbol. Then, the correct amplitude for each of the Alfvén velocity components V*Ai = R, T, N should be determined by the following relation:
V*Ai = R, T, N = VAi = R, T, N
where VAi = R, T, N and |VA| represent the generic component and the speed value of the Alfvén velocity obtained from its canonical form [8], respectively. The parameter ΔVWF is the drift velocity of the specific ion population from the WF.
Figure 2. Column a), top panel: values of the normal component of the proton core velocity fluctuations VN_p1 values of the normal component of Alfvén velocity fluctuations VAN. Column a), bottom panel: same values on the vertical axis vs corrected values of the normal component of Alfvén velocity fluctuations V*AN p1(see text). Column b), same format as for column a but relative to the proton beam velocity fluctuations.
The bottom row of Figure 2 illustrates the effect of the correction applied to the amplitude of the normal component of the Alfvén velocity fluctuations (eq. 1) for the proton core (column a) and proton beam (column b) shown in the top row. This correction improves energy equipartition and enhances the V-VA correlation coefficient, particularly for the proton core population. The scatter plots for the proton core and beam display opposite correlation signs, as these two populations are located on opposite sides relative to the WF.
Figure 3. Column a), top panel: values of the normal component of the alpha core velocity fluctuations VNα1 values of the normal component of Alfvén velocity fluctuations VAN. Column a), bottom panel: same values on the vertical axis vs corrected values of the normal component of Alfvén velocity fluctuations V*ANα1 (see text). Column b), same format as for column a) but relative to the alpha beam velocity fluctuations.
Figure 3, in the same format as Figure 2, shows the effect of the correction applied to the amplitude of the normal component of the Alfvén velocity fluctuations (eq. 1) for the alpha core (column a) and alpha beam (column b). In this case, the improvements in both energies equipartition and the V-VA correlation are even greater than those observed for protons. As in Figure 2, the scatter plots for these two populations exhibit opposite correlation signs, with the α core aligned with the proton core and the alpha beam aligned with the proton beam relative to the WF.
Conclusion
The analysis, extensively presented in [1], carefully examines the distinct kinetic features of the core and beam for both protons and alpha particles and offers a more accurate approach to understanding the physical processes that govern particle distribution in the solar wind. Separating the core and beam in the proton and alpha velocity distribution function is crucial for: i) identifying different origins and behaviors in the different particle populations; ii) understanding plasma instabilities that affect solar wind heating and acceleration; iii) analyzing temperature anisotropies and energy transfer processes; iv) accurately modeling the transport and evolution of solar wind particles, giving insights into the mechanisms that govern solar wind evolution during the expansion.
In conclusion, this separation plays a pivotal role in constructing a far more complete and accurate understanding of the solar wind's dynamics. This is absolutely essential for advancing both theoretical studies and precise modeling efforts.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the grant “Machine Learning on Solar Wind Velocity Distribution Functions” financed by the National Institute for Astrophysics under the call “Fundamental Research 2023.” Solar Orbiter is a space mission of international collaboration between ESA and NASA, operated by ESA. Solar Orbiter SWA data are derived from scientific sensors that have been designed and created, and are operated under funding provided in numerous contracts from the UK Space Agency (UKSA), the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI), the Centre National D'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France), the Centre national d'études spatiales (CNRS, France), the Czech contribution to the ESA PRODEX programme and NASA.
Solar Orbiter SWA work at INAF/IAPS is currently funded under ASI grant 2018-30-HH.1-2022. The authors acknowledge T. Horbury and the MAG Team for Solar Orbiter magnetic field data.
Affiliations
1 INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Roma, Italy;
2 ASI - Italian Space Agency, Rome, Italy
3 INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Torino, Italy
4 Université Lyon, CNRS, École Centrale de Lyon, Écully, France
5 CNR, Istituto per la Scienza e la Tecnologia dei Plasmi, Bari, Italy
6 Planetek Italia S.R.L., Bari, Italy
7 LEONARDO spa, Grottaglie, Taranto, Italy
8 TSD-Space, Napoli, Italy
9 Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNES, Toulouse, France
10 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, UK
11 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA
12 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
References
[1] Bruno, R., De Marco, R., D’Amicis, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 106
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad47b3
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad47b3
[2] De Marco, R., Bruno, R., Jagarlamudi, V., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A108 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243719
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/01/aa43719-22/aa43719-22.html
[3] Owen, C. J., Bruno, R., Livi, S., et al. 2020. A&A, 642.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937259
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/10/aa37259-19/aa37259-19.html
[4] Bruno, R., Carbone, V., Veltri, et al., 2001, P&SS, 49, 1201
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00061-7
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063301000617?via%3Dihub
[5] Matteini, L., Horbury, T. S., Pantellini, F., et al., 2015, ApJ, 802, L11
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/11 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/11
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/11
[6] Němeček, Z., Durovcova, T., Safrankova, J., et al. 2020, APJ, 889, 163
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab65f7
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab65f7
[7] Goldstein, B. E., Neugebauer, M., & Smith, E. J. 1995, GeoRL, 22, 3389
https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03182
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/95GL03182
[8] Belcher, J. W., & Davis, L. 1971, JGR, 76, 3534
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA076i016p03534
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JA076i016p03534
Nuggets archive
2024
13/11/2024: Improved Insights from the Suprathermal Ion Spectrograph on Solar Orbiter
30/10/2024: Temporally resolved Type III solar radio bursts in the frequency range 3-13 MHz
23/10/2024: Resolving proton and alpha beams for improved understanding of plasma kinetics: SWA-PAS observations
25/09/2024: All microflares that accelerate electrons to high-energies are rooted in sunspots
25/09/2024: Connecting Solar Orbiter and L1 measurements of mesoscale solar wind structures to their coronal source using the Adapt-WSA model
18/09/2024: Modelling the global structure of a coronal mass ejection observed by Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe
28/08/2024: Coordinated observations with the Swedish 1m Solar Telescope and Solar Orbiter
21/08/2024: Multi-source connectivity drives heliospheric solar wind variability
14/08/2024: Composition Mosaics from March 2022
19/06/2024: Coordinated Coronal and Heliospheric Observations During the 2024 Total Solar Eclipse
22/05/2024: Real time space weather prediction with Solar Orbiter
15/05/2024: Hard X ray and microwave pulsations: a signature of the flare energy release process
01/02/2024: Relativistic electrons accelerated by an interplanetary shock wave
11/01/2024: Modelling Two Consecutive Energetic Storm Particle Events observed by Solar Orbiter
2023
14/12/2023: Understanding STIX hard X-ray source motions using field extrapolations
16/11/2023: EUI data reveal a "steady" mode of coronal heating
09/11/2023: A new solution to the ambiguity problem
02/11/2023: Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe jointly take a step forward in understanding coronal heating
25/10/2023: Observations of mini coronal dimmings caused by small-scale eruptions in the quiet Sun
18/10/2023: Fleeting small-scale surface magnetic fields build the quiet-Sun corona
27/09/2023: Solar Orbiter reveals non-field-aligned solar wind proton beams and its role in wave growth activities
20/09/2023: Polarisation of decayless kink oscillations of solar coronal loops
23/08/2023: A sharp EUI and SPICE look into the EUV variability and fine-scale structure associated with coronal rain
02/08/2023: Solar Flare Hard Xrays from the anchor points of an eruptive filament
28/06/2023: 3He-rich solar energetic particle events observed close to the Sun on Solar Orbiter
14/06/2023: Observational Evidence of S-web Source of Slow Solar Wind
31/05/2023: An interesting interplanetary shock
24/05/2023: High-resolution imaging of coronal mass ejections from SoloHI
17/05/2023: Direct assessment of far-side helioseismology using SO/PHI magnetograms
10/05/2023: Measuring the nascent solar wind outflow velocities via the doppler dimming technique
26/04/2023: Imaging and spectroscopic observations of EUV brightenings using SPICE and EUI on board Solar Orbiter
19/04/2023: Hot X-ray onset observations in solar flares with Solar Orbiter/STIX
12/04/2023: Multi-scale structure and composition of ICME prominence material from the Solar Wind Analyser suite
22/03/2023: Langmuir waves associated with magnetic holes in the solar wind
15/03/2023: Radial dependence of the peak intensity of solar energetic electron events in the inner heliosphere
08/03/2023: New insights about EUV brightenings in the quiet sun corona from the Extreme Ultraviolet Imager